PolicePosers.com

http://www.king5.com/news/local/Investigators–Police-Posers-behind-high-profile-crimes–71834742.html

A small excerpt from the article itself:

by CHRIS INGALLS / KING 5 Investigators

Posted on November 24, 2009 at 10:51 PM

SEATTLE – A series of recent high-profile crimes all have a common thread. They involve people posing as police officers.

The KING 5 Investigators have learned it may be more than coincidence that there are so many “police posers” on the streets these days and that it is often hard to tell them apart from the good guys.

To passers-by at a Federal Way truck stop earlier this year, it looked like law enforcement was taking down one of its own. A marked K-9 vehicle was pulled over, the man driving it placed in cuffs, and the sidearm from his holster seized. He was stopped by an off-duty King County detective who saw the car driving down I-5 and played a hunch it wasn’t an actual cop.

The rest of the article and video shed a lot of light on the impostor problems the Seattle area is facing which spurred the article. Thank you Chris for the work done on the article and the video.

Actually no they aren’t, but this car could be confused for a clown car. Brought to us in the past by eBay being sold out of New York (by what was assumed as a private emergency volunteer), it appears the new owner in Michigan is now trying to sell it. According to a member of the elightbars.org forum,

“the person wasn’t aware of michigan lighting laws, he had quite a surprise when he got pulled over, the first and second,and third times”

For those out there that are still confused at this point, blue colored lighting is a law enforcement only color in the great state of Michigan. This doesn’t appear to be a cop car in any fashion. So we will have to stay tuned to see if the car sells and if it is sold to another buyer unaware of their state’s lighting laws. Then people wonder why eBay and other sale sites restrict emergency equipment sales on their private web sites. Place your bid and maybe you can have you very own clown car looking emergency service unit!

.

Enjoy!

Across the internet, this day, as every day with the date of 09/11 people are recollecting what they did that day.

Some recount where they were, some recount how they heard the news, and some recount how it affected them. Anyone alive at that time in the USA could probably tell you details of that day regarding their personal lives that they couldn’t if it was just any other normal day.

On several forums people have been going over that day. A lot were in the public safety field at the time, but a lot weren’t. A lot were in school or not even remotely involved in the field. While we all agree that age doesn’t make a difference and experience does, but this is something different. Those who weren’t involved in the public safety field that day will never know what that day felt like to those who were in the field. Although some of those now in the field lost someone they knew, being in the field at the time gave a certain understanding that is hard to describe. Now before you take offense, we are not saying “those not in the field that day don’t care”, but we are finding a growing trend with this group of people talking about that day as if they were first responders that day.

Hearing younger FF or EMS workers who where still in school, or otherwise not members of emergency services, at the time talk about 9-11 as though they were active responders bothers us. They were in school or whatever, and while they may have been scared, they didn’t just witness hundreds of people who where doing the same job as them die in an act of cowardice, we did, along with every other active emergency responder on that day.

We ask everyone to remember ALL of those who lost their lives that day and those who continue to fight for our safety and freedom.

We got this email in June. As normal it came from someone we probably offended and they had to go digging for information to muddy us up with. The typical “you’re making stuff up” came up again along with some stuff we usually get in most of the hate mail we receive. We find it funny most of the hate mail we receive tells us how we are hateful and negative but the same mail tries to call us names, belittles what we do with insults, and tries to justify the actions of those we discuss on the site.

Pretty much, if you don’t like what we do, then quit reading the site and move on. Some people feel the need to send anonymous emails to get the last cowardly word in thinking it harms us. However at most we get a good chuckle on the forums and post it on the main page where people can see the types of people who get mad enough to send us stuff like this. Now for what you have been waiting for, this weeks presentation!

My name is Ray and I just ran across your site last week. While I can say there is a lot of effort, it comes off as nothing but a shrill attempt at an outburst of something you don’t like. Most of the wording and general attitude of the site sounds like it is made by a childlike mentality that is overly concerned for what others do. The flamboyance in your writing has me wondering what your mental capacity for real world social interaction might be. I may come off as insulting you but digress, you are the one who runs a web site devoted to demonizing a select few. Then you do not offering anyone the glimpse of what how perfect you are over those you demonize. I view your vain attempt as pathetic and it makes me wonder if you are what you hate so much deep inside your soul.

Your whacker page says it all. You go into details on personal observations as offering them up as fact on silver platters. I see the only type of person who would chow down at your wealth of knowledge is those who are equally as hateful of their inner demons as you are. Your web site as you call it is not much more on the subject of unbiased fact as Wikipedia is. Both of your sites tout how much you are for doing one thing while being an outlet for the editor’s and author’s life struggles others take as reading material. As another letter posted on your web site said so well, there are no such things as whackers as you describe them. The imposter problem you quote as an epidemic is a mere crime that has fewer cases than purse snatching and red neck incest in the Bible belt.

Since you are a coward who hides behind your domain name I decided to research you a little. I was about to but chose not to pay for an overnight background on you as I would rather frequent my funds to a hobo than find what rock you live under. What I could find on the internet shows a trend of cowardice, trolling, and general lack of social empathy to anyone. I also find people speak of your handle with great disgust and you are pretty much looked at with contempt in every circle I ventured into. Like a sniveling little coward, you never use your real name or give a face for those who you belittle to look into.

Looking over your web site I found a few who faced you. Donna Clark, whom owns a legitimate fire department and Eliot, a person who you robbed photos from to add to your album are the obvious ones. Both gave you a face to look in and you couldn’t even give them your first name in return. Yet, you call them out on the very issue that you hide, standing up to those who are wrong. If it were possible, I would buy them both a round to congratulate them on facing you and winning. They won against you because you backed down from each of them. You attempted to demonize them but failed at both. You basically posted an edited version of what they said, made your rebuttal while sounding smug, and never gave them the chance to counter-rebuttal you.

I could go on all day about your web site and the mentally challenged content it spews but I won’t. Your recent updates sound like the dying breath of a lost cause on your battlefield. Your recent content consists mainly of what your hate or what others hate about you. There are no facts or premise by which your web site will thrive. Unlike Hamsexy.com, you only propel hate and anger at your readers with no humor, insight, or even collegial generated information. Your topics are rehashed from a few months before and this does nothing to keep long term readers. If the whackers were such an epidemic then you would have material oozing out at the seams of your sources. Instead you interject person opinion and dislike into each story and plaster it on the front page of a poorly designed web site.

A true blog or media site usually tries to keep things fresh. You haven’t accomplished this from day one and will never do so. I predict you will be tired of hating through a narrow beam and will grow bored with the web site subject and move on. I hope and pray (actually I’m an atheist and prayer is for the feeble minded) that you don’t hurt others or demonize others in your next subject of hatred after you flushed policeposers.com down the toilet of self serving web sites.

This is the part where I bid farewell. I have called you faceless and a coward throughout this letter several times. Now you can do the same to me. Ray was a name I chose to start this letter off as a personal one to get your attention. I am not going to reveal who I am or what I am. This is for you to think about as you find something in this letter to get mad about and go throw a tantrum about on your chat board. I also expect to see this on the policeposers site as that is where you blow your steam from your meaningless life. Just take this letter and imaging the author as everyone you have wronged in the life of your web site. Also imagine it as every person you or some simple minded admirer of your site labeled a whacker who was never one. Lights have never killed or hurt anyone but hatred and anger have killed billions. What side are you on?

This is another one of those subjects popping up more and more on message boards: volunteers who quit or resign from their departments, but refuse to give up their lighting on their POV. While this is a small topic, it is an interesting one that has our interest.

The story starts with someone who has invested a lot of time and money into their lighting setup, the lights more than likely conform to their state laws for volunteer POV lights and their permits, although for one reason or another they have to move on from their volunteering hobby. Then the dreaded fact of life comes up, that the lights must go. The former volunteer fights this choice for awhile, and ends up deciding for some reason or another, they are just going to keep them.

What is their motivation? Mainly it is whackeristic intentions; excuses we heard so far stretch from “I am a trained fire fighter/EMT/whatever and might need them” to “you know, because I can.” As we say, we aren’t against people using lights when it is needed and lawful; however people who think they are entitled or it is their right to do so due to their past we are against. Either these types are cast out of their department due to their behavior or they are moving, and don’t want to move on from their flashy light show to live the life of a “normal” civilian. They evolve from a legitimate lighting user, to a whacker, the moment they leave their respective department. Just like a former police officer doesn’t wear his populated duty belt or a former member of the military wearing their class A uniform everywhere they go.

So to wrap up this week’s update, know when to call it quits and to leave behind the dream. Lights are tools that should only be used by those trained, certified, and who use them lawfully and ethically.

While we cover a lot of topics on the whacker and wannabe epidemic, some topics are on the fringe but still interesting. This is one of those topics. Where this one started is deep in the FCC rules it says anyone can transmit on a public safety owned radio frequency if there is an emergency that requires attention and/or help. Like a lot of rules, this is one of those that are there in case something happens but is rarely, if ever used due to the other modes of communication around now days. Now for the most part we have cell phones, land line based phones, or even people who are certified to handle emergencies to relay the information for us.

Like lighting laws, 99% of the public doesn’t know nor do they care with what they can get away with. Probably the same part of the population doesn’t know about this long forgotten rule that we discussed above from the FCC. Now this is where our topic of the week gets interesting. In the past we have heard of licensed amateur radio operators (hence known as “hams”) modifying their ham radios to talk on public safety bands (sections of frequencies devoted to ONLY the public safety sector). Their rational is they do this in case they need to talk to the professionals to report and emergency. While it is not illegal to do this, some have to wonder why with other legal and less intrusive means of communication available. Some have even gone as far as to transmit on these frequencies to hear the repeater on the other end acknowledge the transmission. Like impostors and select wannabes, they get the thrill like a little kid who got into the cookie jar and did something bad. As they giggle to themselves, we shake our heads in disbelief.

To go a step further, some look for reasons to abuse this privilege. While it be volunteering at some amber light club in a pseudo-self described official capacity or being a vigilante crime stopper.

We recently found where a user that goes by the name of “REACT” on a popular lighting forum and they went into detail on why they have these frequencies programmed into their China radio and why they insist they will use them in any emergency:

“I am perfectly legal having it programmed with the local Sheriff, Fire, and EMS channels and repeaters, as well as their CTS/DCS tones, and I do! Even on the scene of an emergency, it can be vital to be able to communicate to emergency personnel. For example:

Say I am closing a road to traffic for a vehicle accident with injuries. The firemen are on the scene attempting to push/lift a car off of a woman. A car comes up to me with a drunk driver inside, who drives right past me. I can grab my radio, touch two buttons, and be saying “WATCH OUT” into the mic. Believe me, I’ve heard firemen, police, and EMS do the same thing when they see a car barreling up to the scene, “Heads up, car!” While it may not be the best option (depending on how far from the scene I am blocking traffic), it is definitely viable in a lot of cases. If someone is on scene and hurt, and myself and others are there in response, you better believe that the situation is classified as an emergency.”

Later in their post:

“Say I am on a county road and I see a telephone pole fall in high winds, right inside of a house, sparking an instant fire. I can simply call in on my GMRS designated REACT frequency to alert the central dispatcher at the sheriff’s office of the situation, but if my REACT repeater were offline, or if I were not a member of REACT, and just a local ham, you’d better believe I would be on the fire frequency for my county contacting the dispatcher. I’m not going to drive 10 miles to try to find a pay phone that I think might be located at such and such gas station–if the cord is still attached and it’s not jammed with a quarter. I’m not going to go to the house next door and knock and wait on someone to answer and give me their portable phone. I don’t have a cell phone, and there are many places in my county where cell phone gets no service. I’m going to act as quickly as possible, because those situations warrant use of ANY frequency of radio I can possibly use at that particular point in time with ANY power level.”

So we can gather from this spectacle that instead of finding other easier ways of communication, we will just bend that FCC rule to our perception of it and use it? If you ever worked on a fire ground or a static law enforcement scene, you would know how confusing someone yelling “watch out” would be over the radio. Add this to the fact they are operating on scene with no direct communication with the incident commander and you have disaster waiting.

In the end there are laws on the books that are there for the very rare emergency, not an excuse for someone to play with the officials. A lot like lighting law abuse by some, others see this as a way to feel closer to the real thing without being a part of the real thing in an official capacity. There are a lot of tools or laws that are there for emergencies but we shouldn’t be going out of our way to find ways to use them. Be normal, use training and common sense in emergency situations.

http://www.badgeworld.com/index.php?p=product&id=2194&parent=163

A member of our staff recently found this jaw dropping impostor kit. Included is a complete outfit made to look like something official along with badge and official looking ID.

Provided on the page is a mostly bogus advertisement saying people need this junk to be better citizens for their “duty to country.” They reinforce this with various quotes from officials, statistics (some true, some stretched) and other fear tactics listed throughout the advertisement. We also viewed the infamous “CCW” badge being advertised through the site so our hopes are low for their concerns for impostors.

If you sit down and think about it you would realize no one would use this for the intended purpose. Kits like this give easy access to impostors to commit crimes with very little shopping for their equipment. Add that to the false advertising that gives a sense of power to anyone buying this stuff and you might have a problem.

Something we have been seeing very recently is vigilante impostors. These are the type that go out and impersonate law enforcement in the name of justice, or more likely they own justice. For the most part they are harmless but their very existence is to confuse the public into following the law. While there is a large following of people who think confusion is cool and harmless, we don’t see it that way and view it as unethical and wrong. Vigilante impostors take to the roads in retired police vehicles and illegal lighting and stop motorist that make them mad and warn them to be better. In the past few months we have seen more than a few different stories about older males performing these actions. The main reason for them to break the law was their opinion on their local law enforcement wasn’t doing enough. So they felt the need to go out and take matters into their own hands without any training or cooperation from the local law enforcement. The latest article we found on this phenomenon the alleged impostor even call the real police for backup on his cell phone and was caught this way.

So in essence, don’t go out and play cop when you aren’t asked to. On top of that don’t do it illegally using your own equipment. If you are unhappy with your local law enforcement, talk to them about it or even your local city/county government. Also see if your area has a neighborhood watch program or even a police auxiliary program. There are better ways to deal with personal disagreements on how the law is enforced other than impersonating and breaking the law to fight crime in your own way.

You have seen them at one time or another, escort whackers. We aren’t talking about just the wide or hazardous load escort vehicles (it is a legitimate job) but the whackers among them. With the lighting market more affordable and easier to obtain, some escort whackers have been brazen enough to cross the line from legitimate use to too much. We here at PolicePosers.com keep tabs on several venues that are either friendly to whackers/wannabes/impostors or embrace them with open arms. The escort whackers have been stepping into the spot light in recent times with their prolific abuse and overuse of lighting and even illegally or illegitimate lighting.

While the line of illegal and illegitimate lighting is different among different groups, we will highlight what we see here. A few escort whackers forget their presence is a passive one, mainly there for warning other roadway motorists of the potential hazard they are escorting. While this is what a lot of escort employees expect, others think they own the road they drive on and make attempts at confusing or intimidating motorists to pull over or otherwise yield to the escort service and/or the load they are escorting. Some examples are illegally colored lighting, flashing OEM lights on the escort vehicle itself (Tail light Flashers, Head Light Flashers), or even aggressive tactics such as using the shoulder of the road to pass and so forth. More than once our members have witnessed escort vehicles set up to look like in service police cruisers with lighting, graphics, and even uniforms.

So where is this all going? As time passes, REAL emergency lighting users will need to increase their vehicle lighting more and more to get the public’s attention and keep their response times low. One of the reasons that can be attributed to that is those who don’t need what they have (too much/non-needed lighting) and abuse what they have (treat their amber-only lighting as emergency response lighting). We are talking about overzealous whackers just like what we described above who stretch the limit of what they need in terms of lighting and how many laws they break to get their desired target affect. While most hazardous/wide load escorts are great people with proper lighting setups, some aren’t and makes the rest look bad.

With the surge of people who want to pretend to be something they are not increasing, so are those trying to profit from it. This time we will explore the “Concealed Weapons Permit” Badge or CCW (Carry Concealed Weapon) Badge.

While we are not against the lawfull practice of CCW or firearms in general, we are against these badges circulating in the public. What is the advertised purpose of the CCW badge you might ask? Here’s an example from an auction advertisement that is selling these badges:

So basically in the small possibility you have someone held at gunpoint and a law enforcement officer shows up, you flip out your badge and all is “OK”? Highly unlikely. While the advertisement makes it sound like a common thing, some quick searching could not find any stories that remotely resembled this scenario. The proper things to do in a scenario where a legal firearm owner interacts with law enforcment is highly debated and unique to each situation such that they exceed the scope of this article. There is however one hard and fast rule- NEVER, under any circumstance, point any firearm at a law enforcment officer. What we are going to focus on is seeing if the CCW badge is really intended for it’s advertised purpose or is intended for someone who wants to feel important without the necessary training and certifications to do it the right way.

The CCW badge business is becoming so lucrative that companies will customize any badge to say whatever you want and be of any design with any seal on it that you wish to have.  So what is the real purpose of “customizing” your very own CCW badge that means nothing to the only people who you intend to use it with (LEOs)? Well, we here at Policeposers.com believe that they are catering to the wannabe crowd and to those who think having a CCW badge also gives them the authority to perform law enforcement duties. Many wanabees fail to understand that a badge is the symbol of the authority granted an officer by the government, and not the source of it.

So next time when you see someone carrying a CCW badge, you will probably wonder “why?” Most CCW permit holders are level headed and don’t need badges, shields, or any other device to further exemplify their authority. In most cases having a CCW permit makes you want to hide your weapon from the general public. Wearing a badge on your belt (as we found to be a recommended tactic by some sites selling these badges) doesn’t do anything but create confusion about what people perceive you as. Wannabes get their rush from the confusion and that is our point here. So in the end folks, leave the badges to the public safety sector and Halloween costumes for children and live your life like regular people who happen to be CCW permit holders.